Mathia Lee ~ Plans and Preoccupations

HIV – Knowing YOUR real risk

Posted in Life and Death, Sexuality, Social Commentary by mathialee on January 19, 2010

Lots of HIV figures you see in the newspapers are national averages. What you DON”T know, but SHOULD be looking at, are the rates amongst the sub-groups you are having sex with.

‘Cos by averaging the cases across the entire country’s huge population, the HIV rates looks less scary, the countries don’t look so bad. High risk sub-groups are where most of the HIV cases are concentrated in.

.

.

Your risk :

In Asia, MSM (Men who have Sex with Men) are disproportionately affected by HIV. HIV prevalence amongst MSM in Bangkok estimated at 28%. If you went to Bangkok and had unprotected sex with 3  men who have sex with men, at least 1 of them could be HIV+.
.

.

In Sg,  >90% of HIV+ are male.  1/4 these men are/were married. >90% females are/were married. (See diagram)

What does this mean?

.

It means that if you (female or male, married or not) are having sex with a MSM, the statistics alone put you at much higher risk.

.

If you’re having anal sex, (female or male), the biology puts you at a much higher risk.

.

.

.

If you think you can get away by having a young girl or boy, that’s the stupidest assumption to ever make in your life. Yes, even if you’re straight.

.

In Asian cities where the sex workers don’t ask for condoms, half of them can be HIV+. In Batam, 1 in 6 sex workers have HIV. And because people presume younger sex workers are less risky, more people go for the young ones. Hence, HIV prevalence amongst the teen sex workers can be MORE than DOUBLE that amongst those above 20yrs old.

.

.

.

In Sg, ~50% the HIV infections detected only in the late stage. This means that there are probably many more HIV+ people who are very healthy, unaware of their status, and transmitting it if they’re having unprotected sex.

.

That means you could unknowingly spread it to your wife, and by the time you fall ill, it’s been 5 years too late.

.

.

Your life as a consequence

In Dec08, we thought HIV was going to be treated like any other chronic diseases, and generic drugs subsidised (http://mathialee.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/say-yes-to-aids-treatment-subsidies/ )

.

( Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan told The Straits Times he agreed with the view that HIV should be treated ‘like any chronic disease’. ‘The committee of experts will apply the same approach as they do when evaluating drugs for other diseases. We should not single out HIV for special treatment,’ he said. …..  Health Minister asked the Communicable Diseases Centre (CDC) to draw up a list of drugs that should be eligible for subsidies. http://app.mfa.gov.sg/pr/read_content.asp?View,11626,  Full Report in Comments)

.

.

Over the weekend,  we learn that HIV treatments are NOT going to be subsidized. They can now be funded by Medifund.

.

(Offering subsidies for all patients could “open a floodgate”, he noted. While previous media reports pointed to the ministry subsidising HIV medication, MOH told MediaCorp on Friday: “Minister Khaw Boon Wan and MOH did not commit in 2008 to subsidising HIV medication.” “Our stand in 2008 was that HIV should be considered like any other chronic disease when evaluating the suitability of providing subsidies for medications.” “MOH has chosen to use the Medifund route to more flexibly help HIV patients with their bills, including that for anti-retroviral drugs if needed. Doing so allows available funds to be focused to provide appropriate amounts of assistance to the most deserving cases.”  http://www.todayonline.com/Print/Singapore/EDC100116-0000124/Medifund-to-help-needy-Sporeans-who-require-HIV-treatment )

.

.

.

This means that you still have to fork out ~$1200 of your salary each month for HIV treatments. That’s if you keep your job, because there are no laws protecting your job. It means that this (http://mathialee.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/living-with-hiv-in-singapore/ ) could still be your life. When you get to a desperately poor stage however, you can now use Medifund.  Or you can still go to Thailand to get 3-months supply at a time for $100-200 at anytime.

.

.

.

What’s my point? What can you do?.

My point is that, please, just NEVER have unprotected sex. ALWAYS use a condom. Condoms are 99% protective, when used 100% of the time, correctly.

.

.

Please remember, HIV is NOT like other Chronic Diseases (and will NOT be treated as one, in terms of subsidies too).

Why?

.

One cigarette won’t give you lung cancer. One fatty MacDonald’s meal won’t give you a heart attack. One huge glass of coke won’t give you diabetes. You have to screw up again and again, over years and years, by smoking and eating/drinking unhealthily.  

.

.

But HIV is different.

You can do the right thing 99.9% of the time. Use a condom 99% of the time. Be faithful 99% of the time. Probably even abstain 99% of the time.

.

But just one slip-up. One mistake. One moment of carelessness when you were drunk.

.

Just ONCE. And that’s enough. HIV infection is not something you accumulate through years of casual unsafe sex. It’s something you get in a single sex session.

.

.

And for that you pay. You pay with your health, your dignity, and your finances. 

.

.

While the guy next door who ate char kway teow for 50 years and now has a stroke lies in the C class ward with loads of subsidies and sympathy.  

.

.

Life is not fair. The world is not fair. People are not fair.

.

.

.

So don’t let yourself down. You’re the only one who can take care of yourself. Please stay safe, always use a condom (yes, 1 condom, not 2) .

.

.

.

( I would love to ask you to help spread this message.  However, be warned: there will be people who will accuse you of encouraging homosexuality or a gay lifestyle or immorality.  Since male homosexuality is against the law, you may be accused of abetting a criminal act. You may lose your friends.)

.

( Sources: WHO Best Practices publication “HIV and Men who have Sex with Men in Asia and the Pacific”.
-J Infect. 2006 Oct;53(4):255-9. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
-AIDS. 2000 Dec 1;14(17):2731-40.
- MOH http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/statistics.aspx?id=246 )

15 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. mathialee said, on January 19, 2010 at 9:57 am

    http://app.mfa.gov.sg/pr/read_content.asp?View,11626,

    Straits Times (6 December 2008) – Subsidised drugs for HIV patients

    Dec 6, 2008

    Subsidised drugs for HIV patients

    Health Minister agrees it should be treated like any other chronic disease

    By Salma Khalik

    PEOPLE with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), who have long complained about the cost of medication here, are about to get some relief – the Government has decided to subsidise their medicines.

    This change of heart came on Monday, when the Health Minister asked the Communicable Diseases Centre (CDC) to draw up a list of drugs that should be eligible for subsidies.

    This is a major change for those living with HIV, who number about 2,000 now.

    It gives them access to drugs that can keep them well and alive for many years. More significantly, it means that HIV infection will finally be treated no differently from other chronic illnesses.

    Left untreated, HIV causes Aids or the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, which can lead to death. It was the only major illness in Singapore for which medication was not subsidised.

    The head of the CDC, Associate Professor Leo Yee Sin, said her doctors are overjoyed as the change means patients with HIV no longer need to die because they can’t afford the drugs to keep them alive.

    About a dozen CDC patients die each year as they cannot afford the medicines.

    Infectious disease specialists at the CDC are ‘burning the midnight oil’ to draw up the list of medicines for the ministry’s approval, she added.

    Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan told The Straits Times he agreed with the view that HIV should be treated ‘like any chronic disease’. ‘The committee of experts will apply the same approach as they do when evaluating drugs for other diseases. We should not single out HIV for special treatment,’ he said.

    The move by public hospitals to offer HIV screening to in-patients is in line with this policy, he added.

    People with HIV need to take a combination of at least three medicines, which can cost over $1,000 a month here. Most patients find it hard to foot the bill.

    The same medicines in Thailand cost $100-$200 for a month’s supply.

    Dr Leo said generic medication will be heavily used in line with national policy.

    But some non-generic drugs would need to be subsidised, as generics can only help about 70 to 75 per cent of patients. Newer medicines are more effective and have fewer side effects, but also cost more.

    Government subsidies for medicine take two forms: For most medicines, about 800 different types, patients pay $1.40 for a week’s supply. Another 180 drugs, usually more expensive but still essential, get a 50 per cent subsidy.

    It is not known what rate of subsidy HIV/Aids drugs will receive.

    Dr Roy Chan, president of the voluntary organisation Action for Aids, expects more people to come forward for HIV screening, with the prospect of cheaper treatment.

    Those diagnosed and treated early can live a productive life well into their 60s.

    Already, greater awareness of the benefits of early treatment and hospital screening has led to the CDC seeing 10 per cent more newly diagnosed patients this year.

    Last year, 423 people were diagnosed with HIV. This year, the number may well reach 500, with 382 already diagnosed in the first 10 months.

    In Singapore, the majority of those infected with HIV are heterosexual men.

    A man in his 30s, who asked to be called Ben, needs the more expensive medicines, as he is allergic to other drugs.

    Most of the $1,000 to $1,500 he used to earn each month went on the medicine. His Medisave money has been completely wiped out too.

    He welcomed the move to provide patients like him with subsidised medicines.

    Like many others here, he has been getting supplies of the HIV drugs he needs from Bangkok, where they cost less.

    The recent shutdown of airports in Bangkok left people with HIV here worrying that their medicine supplies would be disrupted.

    salma@sph.com.sg

    Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Condition of Access

  2. mathialee said, on January 19, 2010 at 9:58 am

    http://www.todayonline.com/Print/Singapore/EDC100116-0000124/Medifund-to-help-needy-Sporeans-who-require-HIV-treatment

    ——————————————————————————–
    Medifund to help needy S’poreans who require HIV treatment
    05:55 AM Jan 16, 2010
    by Alicia Wong
    SINGAPORE – It has taken a long time, but starting Feb 1, needy Singaporeans who require HIV treatments can turn to Medifund for assistance.

    According to the Ministry of Health (MOH), “this decision is in response to feedback … that some of these patients would require additional financial assistance to cover their treatment”.

    Patients will be subject to means-testing, said MOH. It will inject $8.5 million into Medifund, to be used for all needy Singaporean patients.

    “The (Medifund) Committee will need to balance between the needs of the HIV and non-HIV patients,” said the ministry.

    The amount of help depends on a patient’s financial and social circumstances and the bill size incurred, but Medifund may assist with up to 100 per cent of a patient’s share of the bill.

    It has long been argued that the cocktail of anti-retroviral HIV drugs available in Singapore, which costs from $9,800 to $14,300 per year, is too expensive. Patients can only use up to $550 a month from Medisave for HIV treatment.

    Latest figures show there are some 2,700 HIV-infected Singaporeans.

    In a blog post, Medifund Advisory Council chairman Gerard Ee recalled how MOH had to reject helping HIV patients with their treatment many years back because HIV was then “poorly understood” and “drugs were costly with many side effects”.

    Now, patients can continue buying generic HIV drugs overseas to keep costs down, or turn to Medifund if they cannot afford to do so, he said.

    “We’re very happy. It’s taken a long time (to get financial aid for HIV treatments),” said a spokesperson for Action for Aids.

    “We hope, in addition, at least a few of these medications can be classified as standard drugs, so others who do not qualify for Medifund assistance, and who are still currently gainfully employed, will be able to afford these medications as well.”

    To wait until HIV patients are too ill to work before they get financial aid “might be too late,” he said. “International experts are recommending treatment at an earlier stage of infection.”

    General practitioner Chua Thiam Eng, whose clinic offers HIV testing, said patients can face social isolation and have difficulty finding jobs, “so (Medifund assistance) definitely will be helpful”.

    Offering subsidies for all patients could “open a floodgate”, he noted.

    While previous media reports pointed to the ministry subsidising HIV medication, MOH told MediaCorp on Friday: “Minister Khaw Boon Wan and MOH did not commit in 2008 to subsidising HIV medication.”

    “Our stand in 2008 was that HIV should be considered like any other chronic disease when evaluating the suitability of providing subsidies for medications.”

    “MOH has chosen to use the Medifund route to more flexibly help HIV patients with their bills, including that for anti-retroviral drugs if needed. Doing so allows available funds to be focused to provide appropriate amounts of assistance to the most deserving cases.”

    In 2008, MOH disbursed $59 million via Medifund to needy patients. It has advised HIV patients facing financial difficulties to approach medical social workers in Medifund-approved restructured hospitals and institutions. It will continue to monitor the need for Medifund help. Alicia Wong

    URL http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100116-0000124/Medifund-to-help-needy-Sporeans-who-require-HIV-treatment
    Copyright 2010 MediaCorp Pte Ltd | All Rights Reserved

  3. sloo said, on January 20, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    A timely reminder and wonderful piece. Lose my friends? So be it even if i can save their lives by forwarding this feature. great work!

  4. Solo Bear said, on January 20, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    Mathia,

    The ONLY safe method is abstinence till marriage. You may be careful, but what if the condom fails?

    Preaching that there is such thing as the magic condom wards off HIV is not a responsible thing.
    http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com/2010/01/promoting-promiscuity-again.html

    Here is another article to show you that “modern” sex edcuation programme has not worked, does not work and probably will never work.
    http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com/2010/01/sex-ed-grandmas-beat-modern-sex.html

  5. furbelow said, on January 20, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    Dear Solo Bear,

    Marriage is no guarantee either. Looking at the Statistics, 90% of women who gotten HIV were married. =| So what has marriage got to do with it?

  6. Solo Bear said, on January 20, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    furbelow,

    If you think carefully, it is BECAUSE at least one partner does NOT adhere to the abstinence or marriage only rule, that’s why these married women get HIV.

    If BOTH partners adhere to it, there won’t be any case of HIV for married couples, would it?

    In fact, it is the promiscuity of at least one partner (be it he or she practises “safe sex” or not) that is the cause of HIV among married women!

    You have too much faith in the proven to have failed “safe sex” method.

    Stop blaming the traditional time proven guaranteed abstinence or marriage only method, when the cause of the HIV is not adhering to its rules.

  7. mathialee said, on January 20, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    i think its up to each person to make informed choices of what level of risk to take. if u desire 0 risk, abstain for life n never marry. if u choose a 1 in 100 risk, use condoms correctly and consistantly. if u want 1 in 3 risk, which is worse than russian roullete, thats possible too. For different people the joy or pleasure is worth different levels of risk n suffering. But to make informed choices we need accurate info. Those of us who have the info should help our friends. And yes, i think its not ethical to cheat on ur partner, but if u do, at least protect the noth of u with condom use.

  8. Solo Bear said, on January 21, 2010 at 9:02 am

    Mathia:
    >> But to make informed choices we need accurate info.
    >>

    Me:
    That is EXACTLY my point. The info given by “modern” sex educationists is that the condom is part of “safe” or “safer sex”. That is a MISNOMER. The condom should be portrayed as “less risky” of “less unsafe” sex.

    Accurate info received by these people depends on how accurately (and honestly) the message of the condom is given.

    >>Those of us who have the info should help our friends.
    >>

    Me:
    That is the WORST thing to do. If you go to friends who want to have sex, sex, sex, they will NOT care about your safety. The best is still medical professionals who will tell you straight that the condom is NOT 100% safe.

    >>And yes, i think its not ethical to cheat on ur partner, but if u do, at least protect the noth of u with condom use.
    >>

    Me:
    I am not even stepping into that area of cheating partner. To me, what is far more unethical is the projection that the magic condom does wonders, when that is as good as playing Russian Roulette. You just need one live shot to kill you.

  9. Debbie said, on January 21, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    Agree with Mathia that it is up to individual on their values of being faithful. Some say, bodily unfaithfulness is okay as long as the heart remain faithful.

    Mathia, I read from ‘my paper’ today and saw an article written by the name of Ms Martha Lee, did the paper mis-spelled your name?

  10. Debbie said, on January 21, 2010 at 12:32 pm

    The number of HIV positive in married person may not indicate that the risk of contracting HIV is high among married ones. Why?

    It could be due to:

    1 single HIV positive person is sexually active with 10 married people and thus spreading it. This 10 married people have sex with their spouse, end up their spouse contracted HIV, this give a result of 20 married person is HIV positive. The 1 single HIV positive person remain as 1 headcount.

  11. mathialee said, on January 21, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    Hi Debbie

    Nope that’s Dr Martha Lee, sexologist & founder of Eros Coaching. Her speciality is in Public Policy and Management(Masters) and Human Sexuality(DHS). Her training is more from the humanities/communications/psychology side.

    I’m Mathia Lee, yet to graduate still, my speciality is in Developmental Biology (PhD) and I’m moving into a Public Health (research & strategic planning) focus currently, both of which are very hardcore biomedical sciences. My training was more from the basic research lab-based science, at the molecular, cell & genetic level. At present I’m applying the research skills & methodology to the public health sector (which covers everything from HIV to H1N1 to mental health to obesity and cancer), while involving myself in NGO work to understand the sociopolitical aspects which one can only learn from the ground, and not texts. =)

  12. mathialee said, on January 21, 2010 at 2:04 pm

    Solo Bear,

    I respect your right to a different opinion.

    However, I take issue with your statement from your blog “I really don’t understand these so called “modern” self-proclaimed sex educationists, who are not medically trained. I remember during my time, only medically trained personnel (doctors and nurses) are qualified to talk about sex from a medical perspective. ”

    It implies I am self-proclaimed, not medically trained.

    Firstly, the facts I’ve put up are sourced from the WHO, MOH, and various peer reviewed studies, and not my own. I’ve given the references, which anyone can verify against, and I’m sure you can take issue with WHO and MOH if you feel they are hiring self-proclaimed, unqualified experts.

    Secondly, refer to my reply to Debbie, where I describe my training & background. I would like to point out that the products of the research done by the institutes I work with end up in peer reviewed journals that serve as source info for the text books of medically tranined personnel that you trust so much.

  13. Debbie said, on January 21, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    Hi Mathia,

    Thank you for your reply and look forward to see more of you sharing your know-abouts & experience, through your blog of course!

  14. Solo Bear said, on January 21, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    Mathia:
    >>Firstly, the facts I’ve put up are sourced from the WHO, MOH, and various peer reviewed studies, and not my own.
    >>

    Me:
    I am NOT contesting the facts put up. I am contesting that “modern” sex educationists feel that they are qualified to make a statement that “condoms = safe sex”. They throw caution to the wind. They feel that their background gives them the right to highlight the safety of the magic condom, without stressing that the 1% failure rate is good enough to kill you.

    >>Secondly, refer to my reply to Debbie, where I describe my training & background. I would like to point out that the products of the research done by the institutes I work with end up in peer reviewed journals that serve as source info for the text books of medically tranined personnel that you trust so much.
    >>

    Me:
    Aptly said. You just proved my point that these “modern” sex educationists feel they know a lot, didn’t you?

    Ask a professionally medically trained person (doctor or nurse) – does the condom guarantee safety? The answer would be “no”.

    “Modern” sex educationists feel that they know better than these medical professionals. Your statement is a testimony to that.

  15. [...] Healthcare & Healthcare Providers – Mathia Lee: HIV – Knowing YOUR real risk [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.